The Best Lightweight Running Shoes

Lace on one of these models to add some spring to your step.

As both race flats and everyday trainers, the best lightweight running shoes have gone a long way. For example, to conserve ounces, you used to have to sacrifice some padding; this is no longer the case. Supportive and even fully cushioned shoes may now weigh far under eight ounces thanks to innovative midsole foams and top materials. This collection includes pairs that cater to every cushioning and support desire. The ten selections below are the razor-thin racers, cushy long-run-capable trainers, and trail shoes that most wowed our crew with their feather-light weights and remarkable performance out of the hundreds of pairs we test each year at Runner’s World.

Our Top Picks: Best Lightweight Running Shoes

Shoes Price
Most Stable New Balance FuelCell Prism v2 Check Price
Best for Race Day Asics MetaRacer Check Price
Best Daily Trainer Hoka Rincon 3 Check Price
Best for Trails VJ Spark Check Price
Best Zero-Drop Altra Rivera Check Price
Most Versatile New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2 Check Price
Best for Speedwork Brooks Hyperion Tempo Check Price
Most Cushioned Skechers Gorun Maxroad 5 Check Price
Most Affordable Saucony Kinvara 12 Check Price
Best Road-to-Trail Hoka Zinal Check Price

Reviews: Best Lightweight Running Shoes

It’s a Science

Lightweight shoes simply provide greater running performance that feels more effortless. Carrying less weight on your feet can result in reduced energy expenditure and better form and biomechanics, both of which enhance stride economy and efficiency. By researching stride and gait patterns, employing impact-measuring sensors, and developing custom foams that return more energy with each footstrike, brands have perfected their newest lightweight running shoes. In brief, advances in design, chemistry, and biomechanics have resulted in shoes that can help you run faster and farther—or, at the very least, make you feel lighter on your feet while doing so.

How We Tested

According to our RW Shoe Lab research, the shoes listed below are the lightest in the group, and each pair provides some protective padding underfoot. Experiential testing was also a key consideration in our choice of the finest lightweight trainers. Over 250 local wear-testers completed over 100 miles in each of the shoes on this list to measure ride, durability, comfort, and responsiveness.

—MOST STABLE—

New Balance FuelCell Prism v2


Stability shoes are a vanishing breed, but they are not yet extinct. They’re also not merely for slogging along: Consider the Prism, a lightweight, stable speedster ideal for track workouts, tempo runs, and even racing. While this sort of lightweight stability shoe was once more common, certain firms continue to provide decent solutions. (Asics’ Gel-DS Trainer 26, Topo Athletics’ Ultrafly 3, and Saucony’s Fastwitch 9 are all worth a look.) The initial Prism was overly soft, but the second generation is much more refined. It’s soft yet not squishy. Some testers report that it feels firm but provides all the cushioning required. “As a competitive runner with incredibly flat feet, some shoes might be painful when running.” “But I’ve gone through all of my exercises without any trouble in these shoes, even after putting 200 miles on them,” one of our collegiate wear-testers noted.

Pros

  • Good cushioning: The FuelCell Prism v2 is equipped with New Balance’s proprietary FuelCell technology, which provides a responsive and plush feel underfoot.
  • Supportive fit: The shoe has a secure, snug fit that helps to keep the foot in place during dynamic movements.
  • Durable: The shoe’s construction is designed to withstand the wear and tear of regular use, making it a long-lasting choice.
  • Versatile: The FuelCell Prism v2 can be used for a variety of activities, including running, training, and casual wear.

Cons

  • The FuelCell Prism v2 is a high-priced sneaker that may not be suitable for everyone.
  • Not suitable for all types of the foot: Some people may find the shoe’s fit to be less than optimal, particularly those with broader feet or who prefer a more relaxed fit.

—BEST FOR RACE DAY—

Asics MetaRacer


Just when you thought Asics’ reputation was limited to dependable everyday trainers, the company releases the MetaRacer, its first carbon-fiber-plated racing shoe. It combines a rocker-style midsole with a forceful toe spring to assist prevent superfluous ankle movement, saving runners energy. This, along with a carbon-fiber plate in the forefoot, aids in stride efficiency. So, when you’re searching for that second-half pace in a marathon, you’ll still have enough gas to negative split. It also helps that the shoe is incredibly light, weighing around the same as the standard Nike Vaporfly. “Normally, Asics’ cushioning feels far too soft for me—but they were comfortable enough to finish 26.2 miles without being too plush,” remarked one tester. “And Wow, I felt fast—like I was ready to sign up for a huge race.”

Pros

  • Lightweight: The ASICS MetaRacer is meant to be lightweight, making it an excellent choice for competitive and speed-oriented runners who want to go quickly.
  • The shoe features a sleek, streamlined design that gives it a smooth, aerodynamic look and feel.
  • Supportive midsole and top: The MetaRacer has a supportive midsole and upper that helps keep the foot steady during quick, dynamic movements.
  • The MetaRacer is meant to be very responsive, providing a lively, dynamic sensation underfoot.

Cons

  • The MetaRacer is a high-priced sneaker that may not be affordable for everyone.
  • Not for harsh terrain: The MetaRacer is primarily intended for road racing and may not be suited for trail running or another rugged terrain.

—BEST DAILY TRAINER—

Hoka Rincon 3


Since the original Rincon debuted in 2019, it has been a runner-up favorite. It embodies everything we love about Hoka without being a regular Hoka. It’s cushioned to the max, but has a more streamlined profile—rather than the classic hulky Hoka exterior—and is designed for everyday runs, speed work, and even racing. The new mesh top weighs 0.3 ounces less and is considerably more breathable than prior editions, making this multipurpose trainer lighter than previous generations. The curved sole, which Hoka refers to as an early-stage Meta-Rocker, aids in smooth turnover.

Pros

  • Cushioning: The Hoka Rincon 3 has a high amount of cushioning, making it a fantastic choice for anyone who requires more shock absorption, such as those who have joint problems or run long distances.
  • The Rincon 3 is quite lightweight, despite its cushioned nature, making it simpler to run in than many other shoes with the same degree of cushioning.
  • The Rincon 3 offers good stability and support, which can aid in keeping the foot in a healthy, neutral position.
  • The Rincon 3 is versatile and may be used for a range of running activities such as distance running, training, and recreational running.

Cons

  • The Rincon 3 is a high-priced sneaker that may not be affordable for everyone.
  • It may not be appropriate on tough terrain: The Rincon 3 is primarily intended for road running and may not be appropriate for trail running or another tough terrain.

—BEST FOR TRAILS—

VJ Spark


The lugs on the Spark aren’t as long or as sharp as those on a pair of YakTrax, but they provide some of the finest grips we’ve tried. How? The outsole of the Spark is made of 100 percent butyl rubber, which allows it to handle slippery terrain thanks to its tacky hold and general flexibility. The shoe is meant to be ultralight and quick, so while there isn’t enough cushioning for an ultramarathon, the foam underfoot feels enough for trail runs and obstacle events. No, the rather ordinary thick EVA midsole falls short of the latest bouncy nitrogen-injected TPU products. However, you do not purchase the Spark for its cushioning. You buy it for the grip to speedily sidestep roots and rocks, or even to leap an OCR fire pit and mount a rope wall. “I ran with a friend in the Adirondacks who was wearing the Spark,” said deputy editor Jeff Dengate. “He was clinging to the damp rocks of Giant Mountain like a gecko. We had 5,000 feet of vertical gain in the first seven miles and a 3,000 foot down in the last three miles, so it was a little risky.”

Pros

  • Lightweight: The VJ Spark is meant to be lightweight, making it an excellent choice for anyone looking for a shoe that won’t slow them down.
  • Good traction: The Spark has a durable outsole with a good grip, which aids in traction on a variety of surfaces.
  • Breathable top: The Spark boasts a breathable upper that keeps feet cool and dry even in hot and humid weather.
  • Affordable: The Spark is a reasonably priced shoe, making it an excellent choice for anyone seeking a high-quality shoe at a reasonable price.

Cons

  • The Spark is meant to be a quick and agile shoe, so it may not provide adequate cushioning and support for longer, slower-paced runs.
  • Not ideal for those with broad feet: The Spark features a tight fit that may not be suitable for people with wider feet.

—BEST ZERO-DROP—

Altra Rivera


We sped down straightaways in Altra’s Rivera, which has taken the place of the Torin Mesh (both shoes have 26mm stack heights). It feels like you’re jogging barefoot, with just enough protection underfoot to keep errant pebbles at bay. A modest layer of cushioning is provided by the bouncy Ego midsole. The Rivera’s spacious toe box keeps your toes from feeling cramped, and reviewers appreciated the smooth top for its comfortable, hotspot-free fit. Please take your time breaking in these zero-drop sneakers. After a mile, one of our editors scraped her knee after collapsing on the sidewalk, but she got back up and ran five more.

Pros

  • The Altra Rivera has a large toe box, which lets toes stretch naturally, and helps enhance balance and stability.
  • The Rivera is built for comfort, with a soft, cushioned midsole and a flexible top that flows with the foot.
  • Strong arch support and stability: The Rivera offers good arch support and stability, which can aid in keeping the foot in a healthy, neutral stance.
  • The Rivera is versatile in that it may be used for several running activities such as distance running, training, and recreational jogging.

Cons

  • The Rivera’s cushioned construction may make it feel too slow and sluggish for those who prefer a more simple, performance-oriented shoe.
  • Broad toe box may not be suited for narrow feet: Rivera’s wide toe box may not be ideal for people with thin feet.

—MOST VERSATILE—

New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2


The Rebel is all about energy return, which makes it an excellent choice for uptempo training. The original Rebel performed far above average in our lab testing for energy return, and New Balance believes the v2 is even more responsive, so you should anticipate a lively sneaker. It’s constructed with FuelCell foam for a snappy underfoot sensation, and it has a new mesh top for maximum ventilation and weight savings.

Pros

  • The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2 is designed to deliver a responsive and energetic ride, which can assist speed-oriented runners to enhance their performance.
  • Good support: The Rebel v2 offers adequate support and stability, which can aid in keeping the foot in a healthy, neutral position.
  • Despite its supporting construction, the Rebel v2 is quite lightweight, making it simpler to run in than many other shoes with a similar amount of support.
  • Durable: The Rebel v2 is built to last, with a high-quality build that can withstand regular usage.

Cons

  • Long-distance runs may not be ideal: The Rebel v2’s performance-oriented design may not provide enough cushioning and support for longer, slower-paced runs.
  • Not ideal for those with broad feet: The Rebel v2 features a tight, performance-inspired fit that may not be suitable for people with larger feet.

—BEST FOR SPEEDWORK—

Brooks Hyperion Tempo


The Hyperion Tempo is the “training shoe” to the Hyperion Elite 2, although it may also be used as a racing trainer. The shoe is reasonably cushioned, responsive, and less expensive than its $250 equivalent. Although it lacks a carbon-fiber plate, its DNA Flash midsole, which is constructed of nitrogen-infused foam, provides excellent bounce. Tempo also has an advantage in terms of size. The shoe is available in both men’s and women’s sizes, resulting in a more tight, true-to-size fit for ladies (in contrast to the unisex-sized Elite).

Pros

  • Lightweight: The Brooks Hyperion Tempo is meant to be lightweight, making it an excellent choice for anyone looking for a shoe that won’t slow them down.
  • Strong support: The Hyperion Tempo offers good support and stability, which can aid in maintaining the foot in a healthy, neutral position.
  • Responsive: The Hyperion Tempo is designed to give a responsive ride, which can assist speed-oriented runners to enhance their performance.
  • Durable: The Hyperion Tempo is built to last, with a high-quality build that can withstand continuous usage.

Cons

  • Not appropriate for long-distance runs: The performance-oriented design of the Hyperion Tempo may not give enough cushioning and support for longer, slower-paced runs.
  • Not suited for people with broad feet: The Hyperion Tempo features a tight, performance-inspired fit that may be inconvenient for people with broader feet.

—MOST CUSHIONED—

Skechers GOrun Maxroad 5


Skechers is always innovating with its performance running shoes, bringing high-tech materials to its whole portfolio after they’ve proven themselves on lighter, faster versions used by elites like Meb and King Ches. Its HyperBurst foam has been extensively used, but another innovation is working its way down the line, all the way to the Maxroad: an H-shaped carbon-infused plate. Skechers used carbon in their thickest sole, resulting in a more stable and dynamic long-run shoe. At slower speeds, it supports the forefoot by stiffening the platform; at quicker speeds, it adds a little pop on toe-off. One wear-tester, an overpronator who runs 45 miles per week at roughly 7:45 pace and had lauded the cushioning of the GOrun Razor Plus, commended the cushier Maxroad. “This shoe supported me in the correct places, gave me a spring in my stride for speed sessions, and kept its bounce throughout my long runs,” she explained.

Pros

  • Wider feet can be accommodated nicely.
  • Goodyear rubber pods offer superior traction.

Cons

  • Some testers took some time to acclimatize to the extremely high stack height.

—MOST AFFORDABLE—

Saucony Kinvara 12


With its 12th iteration, the Kinvara has returned to its roots. The Kinvara 12 has a greater rebound and rides quicker than the Kinvara 11. It is lighter and more flexible than the Kinvara 11. Saucony accomplished this by modifying the Pwrrun foam’s blend of EVA and polymers to increase energy return. This increases the responsiveness of the midsole while also providing a slightly firmer feel. A narrow layer of softer TPU-based Pwrrun+ foam lies closest to your foot to counteract some of that rigidity, keeping the shoe comfortable as a daily trainer—long runs included.

Pros

  • Lightweight: The Saucony Kinvara 12 is meant to be lightweight, making it an excellent choice for anyone looking for a shoe that won’t slow them down.
  • Good responsiveness: The Kinvara 12 is designed to give a responsive and dynamic ride, which can assist speed-oriented runners to enhance their performance.
  • A tight, performance-inspired fit of the Kinvara 12 might aid to keep the foot secure and reduce slippage.
  • Affordable: The Kinvara 12 is a reasonably priced shoe, making it an excellent choice for anyone searching for a high-quality sneaker at a reasonable price.

Cons

  • Not appropriate for long-distance runs: The performance-oriented design of the Kinvara 12 may not provide enough cushioning and support for longer, slower-paced outings.
  • Not for those with broad feet: The Kinvara 12 features a tight, performance-inspired fit that may not be appropriate for people with larger feet.

—BEST ROAD-TO-TRAIL—

Hoka Zinal


Hoka’s Zinal trail shoe is surprisingly light for a trail shoe—think of it as the brand’s Rincon on the trail. During testing, we discovered that the Zinal performed particularly well for short, quick runs. The obnoxious features, like rock plates, gaiter attachments, and higher lugs, have been dropped in favor of a faster, more nimble underfoot feel. The shoe’s nonaggressive tread (the Zinal has 4mm lugs) makes it a real hybrid for road and trail runs.

Pros

  • Slim, lightweight design
  • Responsive the Profly midsole

Cons

  • Other trail shoe elements to reduce weight are lacking.
Scroll to Top